Yates v. Hambrick

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Yates v. Hambrick

5 Ky. Op. 320, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 276

DecidedJanuary 6, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 320 (Yates v. Hambrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yates v. Hambrick, 5 Ky. Op. 320, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 276 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Whether there was any essential error in the response of the court to the inquiry of the jury, which they had a right to make, or whether or not there was any available error in the failure of the court to answer directly te questions which the jury propounded, if proper exceptions had been taken, as we must presume that the parties, or their counsel were present, and as no exception was taken, the supposed errors of the court are not now available in this court, and there is no other error apparent in the record.

Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Whether there was any essential error in the response of the court to the inquiry of the jury, which they had a right to make, or whether or not there was any available error in the failure of the court to answer directly te questions which the jury propounded, if proper exceptions had been taken, as we must presume that the parties, or their counsel were present, and as no exception was taken, the supposed errors of the court are not now available in this court, and there is no other error apparent in the record.

Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ky. Op. 320, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-hambrick-kyctapp-1872.