Yates v. Dixie Fire Insurance

97 S.E. 209, 176 N.C. 401, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 255
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 13, 1918·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

BeowN, J.

Tbis case was before us last term and is reported 173 N. C., 473. Tbe appeal was dismissed because premature, but an opinion was rendered, as is sometimes done, to facilitate a disposition of a case.

That opinion is authoritative and disposes of this' case, and holds that plaintiffs cannot recover. ' •

We suggest to the judges of the Superior Court that fragmentary and premature appeals be not permitted. It is best that all the issues be' determined and a final judgment rendered before a case is brought to this Court.

Action dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates v. Dixie Fire Insurance, 97 S.E. 209, 176 N.C. 401, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 255 (N.C. 1918).

97 S.E. 209 (Yates v. Dixie Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cowart v. Honeycutt
125 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Veazey v. City of Durham
57 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Cole v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.
20 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Scott v. . Harrison
7 S.E.2d 547 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Johnson v. Pilot Life Insurance
1 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Headman v. . Commissioners
98 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Headman v. Board of Commissioners
177 N.C. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)