Yates v. Commissioner

548 F. App'x 68
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2013·No. No. 13-1833·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency and accuracy-related penalty with respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Yates v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 3685-11 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates v. Commissioner, 548 F. App'x 68 (4th Cir. 2013).

548 F. App'x 68 (Yates v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yates v. United States
Federal Claims, 2020
Miguel Vasquez Macias v. Jefferson Sessions III
681 F. App'x 265 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)