Yates v. Commissioner

548 F. App'x 68
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1833
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 548 F. App'x 68 (Yates v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yates v. Commissioner, 548 F. App'x 68 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency and accuracy-related penalty with respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Yates v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 3685-11 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. United States
Federal Claims, 2020
Miguel Vasquez Macias v. Jefferson Sessions III
681 F. App'x 265 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-commissioner-ca4-2013.