Yates v. Batteford
139 So. 746, 19 La. App. 374
Opinion
Due to a miscalculation on our part the decree rendered by us, among other things, condemned Batteford, defendant, to pay to Yates, plaintiff, the sum of $373.30, with interest, etc.. The amount should have been $420, with interest, etc., instead of $373.30.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree rendered by us on January 11, 1932, be and it is amended so as to correct the figures $373.30 as they appear in the original decree to read $420.00.
The rehearing requested is refused.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yates v. Batteford, 139 So. 746, 19 La. App. 374 (La. Ct. App. 1932).
139 So. 746 (Yates v. Batteford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leon v. Dupre
144 So. 2d 667 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation v. Maggio
141 So. 2d 516 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Haeuser v. Castrogiovanni
106 So. 2d 306 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1958)