Yates v. Bank of Donalsonville
93 S.E. 25, 20 Ga. App. 496, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 949
This text of 93 S.E. 25 (Yates v. Bank of Donalsonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Yates v. Bank of Donalsonville, 93 S.E. 25, 20 Ga. App. 496, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 949 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
This was a suit on a promissory note, and under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for, with interest and attorney’s fees.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 25, 20 Ga. App. 496, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-bank-of-donalsonville-gactapp-1917.