Yate's Mercantile Co. v. Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of Jacksonville
This text of 194 S.W. 1157 (Yate's Mercantile Co. v. Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was filed in the court below by the appellee against the appellants, seeking a judgment for §100 with interest and attorney’s fees on a promissory note. The note was executed by E. T. Yates and W. B. Yates as principals, and its payment was guaranteed by the appellants and other parties who did not appeal. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court below gave a peremptory instruction directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for. The assignments of error present different reasons why that instruction should not have been given.
The record contains no objections nor exceptions to the charge, and for that reason the assignments cannot be considered. Pearce v. Supreme Lodge, 190 S. W. 1156; Thorne v. Dashiell, 189 S. W. 987; Ry. Co. v. Wheat, 173 S. W. 974; Needham v. Cooney, 173 S. W. 979; Ry. Co. v. Feldman, 170 S. W. 133; Donaldson v. McElroy, 184 S. W. 1100; Commonwealth, etc., v. Bryant, 185 S. W. 97,9; McCall v. Roemer, 186 S. W. 409.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 S.W. 1157, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-mercantile-co-v-farmers-guaranty-state-bank-of-jacksonville-texapp-1917.