Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

100 S.E. 725, 24 Ga. App. 303, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 590

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 20, 1919

Docket10511

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 725 (Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance, 100 S.E. 725, 24 Ga. App. 303, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

1. The only ground of the motion for a new trial other than those which complain of the verdict assigns error upon the refusal of the court to order a nonsuit. This exception will not be considered, since the motion for a new trial, which was overruled, assigns error on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. See Collins v. Strickland, 21 Ga. App. 542 (3) (94 S. E. 1035), and cases there cited.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI