Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

100 S.E. 725, 24 Ga. App. 303, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 590
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1919·No. 10511·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.

1. The only ground of the motion for a new trial other than those which complain of the verdict assigns error upon the refusal of the court to order a nonsuit. This exception will not be considered, since the motion for a new trial, which was overruled, assigns error on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. See Collins v. Strickland, 21 Ga. App. 542 (3) (94 S. E. 1035), and cases there cited.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance, 100 S.E. 725, 24 Ga. App. 303, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 725 (Yates & Gladney v. Fireman's Fund Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. Strickland Bros.
94 S.E. 1035 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)