Yates-Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 2017·No. 2D16-2789·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN GAILAN YATES-BAILEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2789 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed June 30, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we find no error in Mr. Yates-Bailey's judgment or

sentence; however, we remand to the circuit court to correct a scrivener's error in the

order of revocation. The order states: "Found in Violation: Revoke probation and

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). sentence the offender to 15 years['] Prison on [Count] 1 and 5 years['] Prison on [Count]

2." Although the remaining record is clear on this point, the order of revocation fails to

correctly recite that Yates-Bailey was found to have violated condition five of his

probation—failing to live without violating any law. Accordingly, the order or revocation

of probation is remanded for the circuit court to correct the scrivener's error to reflect the

violation of condition five.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates-Bailey v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Yates-Bailey v. State (Yates-Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)