Yates-Bailey v. State

221 So. 3d 777, 2017 WL 2821555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9483
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 2017
DocketCase No. 2D16-2789
StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 3d 777 (Yates-Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yates-Bailey v. State, 221 So. 3d 777, 2017 WL 2821555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we find no error in Mr. Yates-Bailey’s judgment or sentence; however, we remand to the circuit court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order of revocation. The order states: “Found in Violation: Revoke probation and sentence the offender to 15 years[’] Prison on [Count] 1 and 5 years[’] Prison on [Count] 2.” Although the remaining record is clear on this point, the order of revocation fails to correctly recite that Yates-Bailey was found to have violated condition five of his probation—failing to live without violating any law. Accordingly, the order or revocation of probation is remanded for the circuit court to correct the scrivener’s error to reflect the violation of condition five.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 So. 3d 777, 2017 WL 2821555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-bailey-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.