Yassian v. Warnick
This text of Yassian v. Warnick (Yassian v. Warnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: RODEO CANON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor.
WILLIAM WARNICK; ANN WARNICK, Nos. 02-56999 individually and as Trustees of the 02-57203 William and Ann Warnick Family Living Trust; ALAN WARNICK; JILL BAP No. CC-01-01428 WARNICK, MaMoP Appellants-Cross-Appellees, ORDER v. FRED YASSIAN; BEVERLY RODEO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Marlar, Montali and Perris, Judges, Presiding
Filed March 8, 2005
Before: Alex Kozinski and John T. Noonan, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* Senior District Judge.
ORDER
The opinion filed March 30, 2004, is withdrawn.
*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
1 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yassian v. Warnick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yassian-v-warnick-ca9-2005.