Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Yassen v. State

Yassen v. State

136 S.E. 544, 36 Ga. App. 311, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 49
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1927·No. 17780·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The question raised in this case is controlled by the decision in Lee v. State, 35 Ga. App. 235 (133 S. E. 281). The Lee case upon its facts does not conflict with Mitchell v. State, 34 Ga. App. 505 (130 S. E. 355). The court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion to set aside the judgment based upon the verdict which had convicted him of receiving stolen goods.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Branch & Howard, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yassen v. State, 136 S.E. 544, 36 Ga. App. 311, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

136 S.E. 544 (Yassen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollis v. State
173 S.E. 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
McBurnett v. State
146 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)