Yassen v. State

136 S.E. 544, 36 Ga. App. 311, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 49
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1927
Docket17780
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 136 S.E. 544 (Yassen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yassen v. State, 136 S.E. 544, 36 Ga. App. 311, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The question raised in this case is controlled by the decision in Lee v. State, 35 Ga. App. 235 (133 S. E. 281). The Lee case upon its facts does not conflict with Mitchell v. State, 34 Ga. App. 505 (130 S. E. 355). The court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion to set aside the judgment based upon the verdict which had convicted him of receiving stolen goods.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Branch & Howard, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollis v. State
173 S.E. 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
McBurnett v. State
146 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 544, 36 Ga. App. 311, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yassen-v-state-gactapp-1927.