Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedFebruary 14, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-09072
StatusUnknown

This text of Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation (Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation, (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 CALLAHAN & BLAINE, APLC 2 Edward Susolik, Esq. (SBN 151081) ES@callahan-law.com 3 Sharon T, Yuen, Esq. (SBN 228356) syuen@callahan-law.com 4 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Ninth Floor Santa Ana, California 92707 5 Telephone: (714) 241-4444 Facsimile: (714) 241-4445 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants YASIR ANWAR, MAYRA ANWAR, YASIR ANWAR AND 8 MAYRA ANWAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE ANWAR FAMILY TRUST DATED MARCH 12, 2012 9

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 12

13 YASIR ANWAR, MAYRA ANWAR, CASE NO. 2:23cv-09072-DSF-AJR 14 YASIR ANWAR AND MAYRA ANWAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 15 ANWAR FAMILY TRUST DATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MARCH 12, 2012, 16 Judge: Hon. Dale S. Fischer Plaintiffs, Magistrate: Hon. A. Joel Richlin 17 v. Complaint Filed: LASC: 02/10/2023 18 Trial Date: May 27, 2025 AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a 19 Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 20

Defendants, 21

22 AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE 23 INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 24 Cross-Complainant, 25 v. 26

YASIR ANWAR, MAYRA ANWAR, 27 YASIR ANWAR AND MAYRA ANWAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE 28 1 ManAd RMCAHR 1K2 ,V 2E0R12D, UJEGSOU S CORTEZ, 2 Cross-Defendants. 3

4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR 2 ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 Plaintiffs Yasir Anwar, Mayra Anwar, Yasir Anwar and Mayra Anwar as 4 Trustees of the Anwar Family Trust Dated March 12, 2012 (collectively, “Anwar 5 Parties”) and Defendant and Cross-Complainant American Alternative Insurance 6 Corporation (“AAIC”), by and through their respective undersigned attorneys of 7 record, stipulate and agree as follows: 8 1. GENERAL 9 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 10 production of attorney-client, confidential, proprietary, financial or private 11 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 12 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the 13 Anwar Parties and AAIC (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to and petition 14 the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge 15 that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 16 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 17 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 18 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in 19 Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 20 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 21 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 22 permission from the court to file material under seal. 23 Any other party or non-party to this action who has not executed this 24 Stipulation and Protective Order as of the time it is presented to the Court for signature 25 may thereafter become a Party to this Stipulated Protective Order, with appropriate 26 modification preserving and protecting information designated as “HIGHLY 27 CONFIDENTIAL,” by all counsel signing and dating a copy of any such modified or 28 amended Stipulation and Protective Order and filing the same with the Court. 1 1.2 Good Cause Statement. 2 This action is likely to involve privileged, confidential, personal, business, 3 proprietary and financial information, and confidential settlement information for 4 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 5 than litigating this action is warranted. 6 This case involves an insurance coverage dispute brought by the Anwar Parties 7 against AAIC, and AAIC’s cross-claims against the Anwar Parties and claims against 8 third party defendants MARK VERDUGO (“Verdugo”) and JESUS CORTEZ 9 (“Cortez”). This coverage dispute involves the Parties’ respective rights and 10 obligations under an insurance policy issued by AAIC to the Anwar Parties regarding 11 the defense and indemnification of the Anwar Parties, Verdugo, and Cortez in an 12 underlying action styled Prado v. City of Visalia, and Salcedo v. Verdugo, Case Nos. 13 VCU283659 and VCU286816, consolidated in the Superior Court for the State of 14 California, County of Tulare (collectively, the “Underlying Action”). 15 AAIC appointed the law firm of Lagasse, Bell Branch + Kinkaid LLP (the 16 “Lagasse Firm”) as defense counsel to the Anwar Parties in the Underlying Action. 17 The Lagasse Firm may possess information that, if disclosed to the general public, 18 may constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or a related protection. The 19 Lagasse Firm may also possess potentially discoverable but confidential and private 20 information, including financial information, proprietary business information, 21 information regarding confidential business practices, including information that 22 implicates the Parties’ and the Lagasse Firm’s right of privacy. Such financial 23 information includes but is not limited to invoices showing the Lagasse Firm’s 24 services. 25 Confidential and private information from parties and third parties may also 26 include financial information, proprietary business information, business data, 27 information regarding confidential business practices, or commercial information 28 (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information 1 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise 2 protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, 3 or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 4 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 5 adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure 6 that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation 7 for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, 8 and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 9 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 10 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith 11 belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is 12 good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Action: This pending federal lawsuit, case number 2:23cv-09072-DSF- 15 AJR. 16 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 17 of information or items under this Order. 18 2.3 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information 19 (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) as specified above pertaining 20 to attorney-client privileged or protected documents related to the Lagasse Firm’s 21 representation of the Anwar Parties in the Underlying Action. 22 2.3.1 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 23 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 24 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 25 Cause Statement, with the exception of documents designated “HIGHLY 26 CONFIDENTIAL” 27 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 28 support staff).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yasir-anwar-v-american-alternative-insurance-corporation-cacd-2024.