Home/New York Court of Appeals/Yashio Enomoto v. Toia

Yashio Enomoto v. Toia

407 N.E.2d 1346, 50 N.Y.2d 826, 430 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2407
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1980·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (67 AD2d 1085).

The regulation of the State Department of Social Services as amended March 9, 1979 (18 NYCRR 349.3) is not applicable to either of the present cases. Accordingly, we have not considered what effect it might have on fact situations similar to those in the cases now before us.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yashio Enomoto v. Toia, 407 N.E.2d 1346, 50 N.Y.2d 826, 430 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2407 (N.Y. 1980).

407 N.E.2d 1346 (Yashio Enomoto v. Toia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Pilla v. Karnsomtob
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Brown
20 A.D.3d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Minino v. Perales
589 N.E.2d 385 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Conrad v. Hackett
149 Misc. 2d 56 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
In re the Estate of Imburgia
127 Misc. 2d 756 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1984)
Rickey v. Perales
102 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re the Estate of Davis
442 N.E.2d 1227 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)