Yashare Ramey v. FXI Corporation D/B/A Fast Express, Inc.
This text of Yashare Ramey v. FXI Corporation D/B/A Fast Express, Inc. (Yashare Ramey v. FXI Corporation D/B/A Fast Express, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 29, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00448-CV
YASHERE RAMEY, Appellant
V.
FXI CORPORATION d/b/a FAST EXPRESS, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 761,702-801
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a final judgment in a garnishment proceeding signed February 11, 2003. Appellant, an intervenor, filed an untimely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 296. The notice of appeal was therefore due thirty days after judgment, i.e. on March 13, 2003. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until March 26, 2003, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal, however.
On April 30, 2003, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On May 8, 2003, we ordered appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal, demonstrating a reasonable explanation for the late filing, on or before May 19, 2003. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b); Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Ctr. Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Appellant did not file a motion as ordered or otherwise respond to appellee=s motion to dismiss. We, therefore, grant appellee=s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
PER CURIAM
Opinion filed May 29, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yashare Ramey v. FXI Corporation D/B/A Fast Express, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yashare-ramey-v-fxi-corporation-dba-fast-express-i-texapp-2003.