Yarish v. State
420 So. 2d 649, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28696
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1982·No. No. 81-2474·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm Yarish’s convictions and sentences for grand theft, dealing in stolen property and violation of probation. However, we do so without prejudice to his right to seek relief via rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yarish v. State, 420 So. 2d 649, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28696 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
420 So. 2d 649 (Yarish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peak v. State
647 So. 2d 164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Eisaman v. State
440 So. 2d 470 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)