Yarish v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yarish v. State

420 So. 2d 649, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28696

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2474

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 420 So. 2d 649 (Yarish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yarish v. State, 420 So. 2d 649, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28696 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Yarish’s convictions and sentences for grand theft, dealing in stolen property and violation of probation. However, we do so without prejudice to his right to seek relief via rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Yarish’s convictions and sentences for grand theft, dealing in stolen property and violation of probation. However, we do so without prejudice to his right to seek relief via rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 So. 2d 649, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yarish-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack