Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co.

309 U.S. 686, 60 S. Ct. 891
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 22, 1940
DocketNo. 819
StatusPublished

This text of 309 U.S. 686 (Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 309 U.S. 686, 60 S. Ct. 891 (1940).

Opinion

[686]*686’Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, arid motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.

Messrs. Drury W. Cooper, Thomas J. Byrne, and Allan C. Bakewell for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 U.S. 686, 60 S. Ct. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yardley-v-houghton-mifflin-co-scotus-1940.