Yarbrough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yarbrough v. State

599 So. 2d 245, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6070, 1992 WL 108400

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 1992

DocketNo. 91-3197

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 599 So. 2d 245 (Yarbrough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yarbrough v. State, 599 So. 2d 245, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6070, 1992 WL 108400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Although the other assertions in the motion do not present any basis for relief, the appellant does make a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under his first point, wherein he contends that his counsel failed to object to jury instructions which improperly combined elements of separate offenses. We therefore reverse the challenged order as to this claim only, and remand for either an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of such portions of the record as will show that the appellant is not entitled to relief.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Although the other assertions in the motion do not present any basis for relief, the appellant does make a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under his first point, wherein he contends that his counsel failed to object to jury instructions which improperly combined elements of separate offenses. We therefore reverse the challenged order as to this claim only, and remand for either an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of such portions of the record as will show that the appellant is not entitled to relief.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 So. 2d 245, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6070, 1992 WL 108400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yarbrough-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack