Yarbrough v. State

73 So. 830, 15 Ala. App. 460, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 12
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The transcript shows certain demurrers that were interposed to the indictment, but if any ruling of the trial court was invoked on these demurrers, it is not shown by the judgment entry or anything appearing in the record. Under these conditions, showing no judgment of the trial court on the demurrers, the record presents no question on the demurrers for review here. — Peters v. State, 100 Ala. 10, 14 South. 896 ; Broadhead v. State, 145 Ala. 681, 40 South. 216; Powell v. State, 89 Ala. 172, 8 South. 109.

(2) The charges set out in the transcript cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, and the record in this case contains nothing purporting to be a bill of exceptions. — Clay v. State, 14 Ala. App. 664, 71 South. 892; Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982.

We have examined the entire record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yarbrough v. State, 73 So. 830, 15 Ala. App. 460, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 12 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

73 So. 830 (Yarbrough v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
272 So. 2d 597 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Bradford v. State
92 So. 17 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)