Yarbrough v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Yarbrough v. State

73 So. 830, 15 Ala. App. 460, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 12

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 So. 830 (Yarbrough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yarbrough v. State, 73 So. 830, 15 Ala. App. 460, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 12 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The transcript shows certain demurrers that were interposed to the indictment, but if any ruling of the trial court was invoked on these demurrers, it is not shown by the judgment entry or anything appearing in the record. Under these conditions, showing no judgment of the trial court on the demurrers, the record presents no question on the demurrers for review here. — Peters v. State, 100 Ala. 10, 14 South. 896 ; Broadhead v. State, 145 Ala. 681, 40 South. 216; Powell v. State, 89 Ala. 172, 8 South. 109.

(2) The charges set out in the transcript cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, and the record in this case contains nothing purporting to be a bill of exceptions. — Clay v. State, 14 Ala. App. 664, 71 South. 892; Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982.

We have examined the entire record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The transcript shows certain demurrers that were interposed to the indictment, but if any ruling of the trial court was invoked on these demurrers, it is not shown by the judgment entry or anything appearing in the record. Under these conditions, showing no judgment of the trial court on the demurrers, the record presents no question on the demurrers for review here. — Peters v. State, 100 Ala. 10, 14 South. 896 ; Broadhead v. State, 145 Ala. 681, 40 South. 216; Powell v. State, 89 Ala. 172, 8 South. 109.

(2) The charges set out in the transcript cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, and the record in this case contains nothing purporting to be a bill of exceptions. — Clay v. State, 14 Ala. App. 664, 71 South. 892; Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982.

We have examined the entire record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 So. 830, 15 Ala. App. 460, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yarbrough-v-state-alactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack