Yarbrough v. Chamberlin

1 White & W. 632
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided June 22, 1881·No. No. 1029, Op. Book No. 2, p. 386·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1122. Forcible entry and detainer; complaint in; requisites of. In a case of forcible entry and detainer the complaint did not show that the premises or any part thereof were situated in the justice’s precinct where the suit was instituted, nor that the relation of landlord and tenant existed between plaintiff and defendant. Held, that for the want of these averments the complaint was insufficient, and that the suit was properly dismissed by the justice of the peace, and that the appellee’s certiorari to the county court should likewise have been dismissed. [Cooper v. Marchbanks, 22 Tex. 1; Williams v. Ball, 52 Tex. 603.] The judgment of the county court refusing to dismiss the appellee’s certiorari and adjudging the possession of the premises to appellee was reversed and the suit dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yarbrough v. Chamberlin, 1 White & W. 632 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

1 White & W. 632 (Yarbrough v. Chamberlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Marchbanks
22 Tex. 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)
Williams v. Ball
52 Tex. 603 (Texas Supreme Court, 1879)