Yarborough v. . Womack

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Yarborough v. . Womack

116 S.E. 724, 185 N.C. 607, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 125

DecidedFebruary 28, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 724 (Yarborough v. . Womack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yarborough v. . Womack, 116 S.E. 724, 185 N.C. 607, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 125 (N.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to questions of fact, which the jury alone could determine. After a careful perusal of the record, we are satisfied that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the law as bearing on the subject, and no sufficient reason has been found for disturbing the result below. All the exceptions are directed to alleged errors in the charge, but we have discovered nothing prejudicial or hurtful in this respect. The trial and judgment must be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to questions of fact, which the jury alone could determine. After a careful perusal of the record, we are satisfied that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the law as bearing on the subject, and no sufficient reason has been found for disturbing the result below. All the exceptions are directed to alleged errors in the charge, but we have discovered nothing prejudicial or hurtful in this respect. The trial and judgment must be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 724, 185 N.C. 607, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yarborough-v-womack-nc-1923.