Yarborough v. State
This text of 120 S.E. 791 (Yarborough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions sued out in this ease being upon the overruling of a demurrer 'to the accusation, and ,it appearing that after the submission of the case to this court the plaintiff in error was tried under the identical accusation involved in this case and was acquitted by the verdict of a jury, the questions raised in the present bill of exceptions have become moot and will not be passed upon by this court.
2. There is no provision of law, in criminal cases, for the taxing of costs against the State (Sigman v. Austin, 112 Ga. 570, 574, 37 S. E. 894), and, therefore, the contention of counsel for the plaintiff in error, that the costs incurred should be taxed against the State, is without merit.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 S.E. 791, 31 Ga. App. 484, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yarborough-v-state-gactapp-1923.