Yantzi v. Norton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Yantzi v. Norton

974 S.W.2d 539, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 1998 WL 295485

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yantzi v. Norton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1998·No. No. WD 53950·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Willard S. Norton and Norton & Schmidt Consulting Engineers, Inc. appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the trial court’s order reinstating the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs without first deducting the amount of the plaintiffs settlement with another party. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order but have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Willard S. Norton and Norton & Schmidt Consulting Engineers, Inc. appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the trial court’s order reinstating the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs without first deducting the amount of the plaintiffs settlement with another party. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order but have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Rule 84.16(b).

Yantzi v. Norton, 974 S.W.2d 539, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 1998 WL 295485 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

974 S.W.2d 539 (Yantzi v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.