Yanow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

358 F.2d 743, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 806
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 15, 1966·No. Nos. 15658, 15659·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this petition for review the taxpayers contend that the Tax Court erred when it held they were not entitled to take, under Section 167(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, allowances for depreciation of three properties which they owned and rented to their controlled corporations, where the rentals charged to the corporations were admittedly nominal when compared to the fair rental values of the leased properties.

The taxpayers urge that the properties were held “for the production of income” and allowances for depreciation should be permitted for that reason.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the Tax Court correctly found that the properties were not held for the production of income or used in the trade or business of the taxpayer.

The petition for review will be denied. The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Train in his opinion reported at 44T.C. 444 (1965).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yanow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 358 F.2d 743, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 806 (3d Cir. 1966).

358 F.2d 743 (Yanow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related