Yanolatos v. Rotterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yanolatos v. Rotterman

13 A.D.2d 917, 215 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 917 (Yanolatos v. Rotterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yanolatos v. Rotterman, 13 A.D.2d 917, 215 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs to appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos, their actions severed and a new trial ordered as to such appellants unless respondent stipulates to increase the verdict in favor of Annie Yanolatos to $25,000 and the verdict in favor of David Yanolatos to $2,500, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants. On the record before us, the verdicts in favor of appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos are grossly inadequate and should not have been less than $25,000 for Annie Yanolatos and $2,500 for David Yanolatos. The judgment in favor of plaintiff Elizabeth Yanalatos is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs to appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos, their actions severed and a new trial ordered as to such appellants unless respondent stipulates to increase the verdict in favor of Annie Yanolatos to $25,000 and the verdict in favor of David Yanolatos to $2,500, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants. On the record before us, the verdicts in favor of appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos are grossly inadequate and should not have been less than $25,000 for Annie Yanolatos and $2,500 for David Yanolatos. The judgment in favor of plaintiff Elizabeth Yanalatos is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 917, 215 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yanolatos-v-rotterman-nyappdiv-1961.