Yankocy v. Heinrich

280 A.D. 307, 113 N.Y.S.2d 614
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 17, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 307 (Yankocy v. Heinrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yankocy v. Heinrich, 280 A.D. 307, 113 N.Y.S.2d 614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On the testimony adduced in this record, oral and documentary, the plaintiff proved a prima facie case and the court should not have dismissed the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case in a trial before the court and a jury. The issues were issues of fact and not of law involving in part issues relating to credibility and the real factual relationship of the parties as distinguished from the form thereof. Even if, assuming but not deciding, that the measure of damages sought may not have been proper, that does not invalidate the cause of action alleged and established at least prima facie (Towers Realty Corp. v. Fox, 278 App. Div. 74, 75 [1st Dept., March 27, 1951]). The issues were for the jury on a proper charge.

The judgment appealed from directing a verdict in defendant’s favor and dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Werblud v. Mehadrin Dairy Corp.
11 Misc. 2d 167 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D. 307, 113 N.Y.S.2d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yankocy-v-heinrich-nyappdiv-1952.