Yanke v. State

546 So. 2d 1192, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1858, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401, 1989 WL 86788
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1989·No. No. 87-03400·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in defendant’s contentions on appeal except for his contention that his sentencing guidelines score was erroneously calculated. We agree with that contention. See Yanke v. State, 540 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 547 So.2d 1212 (1989).

Defendant’s convictions are affirmed, the sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yanke v. State, 546 So. 2d 1192, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1858, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401, 1989 WL 86788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 1192 (Yanke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. State
546 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)