Yanherwaarden v. Karten

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yanherwaarden v. Karten

466 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13402

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1985·No. No. 84-1974·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of judgment pursuant to a jury verdict and denial of appellant’s motion for new trial. The appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the trial court’s denial of all four challenges for cause made during the jury selection process. See, e.g., Stokes v. State, 54 Fla. 109, 44 So. 759 (1907).

ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of judgment pursuant to a jury verdict and denial of appellant’s motion for new trial. The appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the trial court’s denial of all four challenges for cause made during the jury selection process. See, e.g., Stokes v. State, 54 Fla. 109, 44 So. 759 (1907).

ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Yanherwaarden v. Karten, 466 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13402 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

466 So. 2d 446 (Yanherwaarden v. Karten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related