Yang v. Oklahoma State Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

GAUNG YANG and ZHOI CHAUO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-24-1067-R ) STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. ) OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF ) NARCOTICS AND DANGEROUS ) DRUGS CONTROL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court 1s Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 5]. During the pendency of the Motion, Plaintiffs’ sought leave to Amend [Doc. No. 8], which the Court granted [Doc. No. 9], and an Amended Complaint was then filed [Doc. No. 10]. This Amended Complaint “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation omitted). Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 5, is therefore DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 234 day of December, 2024.

DAVID L. RUSSELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE