Yanez v. State

802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17816, 2001 WL 1613858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2001·No. No. 3D00-3484·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the circumstantial evidence relied upon by the State was insufficient as a matter of law to establish guilt, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for trespass to a conveyance. See R.D.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yanez v. State, 802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17816, 2001 WL 1613858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 463 (Yanez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.D.S. v. State
446 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)