Yanez v. State
802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17816, 2001 WL 1613858
This text of 802 So. 2d 463 (Yanez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Yanez v. State, 802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17816, 2001 WL 1613858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Because the circumstantial evidence relied upon by the State was insufficient as a matter of law to establish guilt, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for trespass to a conveyance. See R.D.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
R.D.S. v. State
446 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17816, 2001 WL 1613858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yanez-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.