Yandolino v. Gelco Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yandolino v. Gelco Corp.

277 A.D.2d 223, 715 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 223 (Yandolino v. Gelco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yandolino v. Gelco Corp., 277 A.D.2d 223, 715 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal.injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated December 3, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they were not negligent in the happening of the accident. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Coley v Michelin Tire Corp., 99 AD2d 795). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal.injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated December 3, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they were not negligent in the happening of the accident. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Coley v Michelin Tire Corp., 99 AD2d 795). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 223, 715 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yandolino-v-gelco-corp-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack