Yancy Douglas Hardy v. United States Board of Parole

443 F.2d 402, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9948
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 28, 1971·No. 26552_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, under sentences of imprisonment for violations of state and federal law, wants credit on his federal sentence for the time he served in state prison. He bases his contention on the fact that the sentence by the state court was made to run concurrently with the sentence he was then serving.

It is fundamental that appellant’s federal sentence did not begin to run until appellant, a parole violator, was returned to federal prison for the service of the balance of his sentence. 1 Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 58 S.Ct. 872, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938); Clark v. Blackwell, 374 F. 2d 952 (5th Cir. 1967); Hash v. Henderson, 385 F.2d 475 (8th Cir. 1967). The cases cited by appellant do not support his contention.'

Judgment affirmed.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 3568.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yancy Douglas Hardy v. United States Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 402, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9948 (9th Cir. 1971).

443 F.2d 402 (Yancy Douglas Hardy v. United States Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meagher v. Clark
943 F.2d 1277 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
Meagher v. Dugger
737 F. Supp. 641 (S.D. Florida, 1990)
Youngworth v. United States Parole Commission
728 F. Supp. 384 (W.D. North Carolina, 1990)
Williams v. State
280 N.W.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1979)
Lionel v. Day
430 F. Supp. 384 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1976)
United States v. Donald C. Graham
538 F.2d 261 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Willie J. Dobine v. United States Attorney General
456 F.2d 1256 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)