Yancey v. Yancey

52 A.D.2d 603, 382 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a partition action, defendant appeals from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 11, 1975, as modified the Referee’s report by crediting plaintiff with the reasonable rental value of defendant’s occupancy [604] of the premises during the time he was in sole possession thereof up to the time of the divorce. Interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Generally, in an action for partition, the court may require the parties to do equity as between themselves. On the facts in the present case, it was within the power of Special Term to offset, as against defendant’s credit for expenses incurred in maintaining the property, the reasonable value of his use and occupancy thereof (see Ann 51 ALR2d 388, 395-396). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yancey v. Yancey, 52 A.D.2d 603, 382 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 603 (Yancey v. Yancey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worthing v. Cossar
93 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)