Yancey v. New York City Housing Authority

305 N.E.2d 487, 33 N.Y.2d 759, 350 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 979
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 14, 1973·Published

Opinions

Order modified, without posts, in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: There is sub[760]*760stantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner was guilty of the charges as found by respondent. However, the penalty of dismissal is excessive as a matter of law (CPLR 7803, subd. 3; see, e.g., Matter of Bovino v. Scott, 22 N Y 2d 214; Matter of Bell v. Waterfront Comm. of N. Y. Harbor, 20 N Y 2d 54, 63). His discharge is annulled and the measure of discipline is reduced to a suspension for the period from February 10, 1967 to April 27, 1972.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Gabbielli and Wachtleb. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion. Judge Jones dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion. Taking no part: Judge Bbeitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yancey v. New York City Housing Authority, 305 N.E.2d 487, 33 N.Y.2d 759, 350 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 979 (N.Y. 1973).

305 N.E.2d 487 (Yancey v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Roge v. Valentine
20 N.E.2d 751 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)