Yancey v. Littlejohn

9 N.C. 525
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1823·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the question, whether the Plaintiff made use of due diligence, and whether the notice to the Defendant was given in reasonable time, were properly left to the Jury, by the presiding Judge, and that he correctly explained to them the law arising upon the case, therefore we sec no reason why a new trial should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yancey v. Littlejohn, 9 N.C. 525 (N.C. 1823).

9 N.C. 525 (Yancey v. Littlejohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.