Yanakos, Pets v. UPMC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Yanakos, Pets v. UPMC

183 A.3d 346

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 28, 2018·No. 330 WAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28 ^th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Does the MCARE Statute of Repose violate the Open Courts guarantees of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article I, § 11, where it arbitrarily and capriciously deprives some patients of any access to courts, but permits actions by similarly situated patients?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28 ^th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Does the MCARE Statute of Repose violate the Open Courts guarantees of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article I, § 11, where it arbitrarily and capriciously deprives some patients of any access to courts, but permits actions by similarly situated patients?

Yanakos, Pets v. UPMC, 183 A.3d 346 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

183 A.3d 346 (Yanakos, Pets v. UPMC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related