Yan v. Xing Jiang

241 S.W.3d 930, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 37064
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 2, 2008·No. 05-07-01028-CV·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

PER CURIAM.

On August 6, 2007, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case indicating he was appealing a final default judgment order of the trial court dated July 28, 2007. The clerk’s record, however, reflects a motion for new trial was granted on September 26, 2007. Appellant did not respond to this Court’s November 1, 2007 letter questioning our jurisdiction over the appeal.

Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature deems appealable. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ). An order granting new trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over the appeal. See Boris v. Boris, 642 S.W.2d 855, 856 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1982, no writ).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yan v. Xing Jiang, 241 S.W.3d 930, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 37064 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

241 S.W.3d 930 (Yan v. Xing Jiang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related