Yan v. Xing Jiang

241 S.W.3d 930, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 37064
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 2, 2008
Docket05-07-01028-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 241 S.W.3d 930 (Yan v. Xing Jiang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yan v. Xing Jiang, 241 S.W.3d 930, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 37064 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

PER CURIAM.

On August 6, 2007, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case indicating he was appealing a final default judgment order of the trial court dated July 28, 2007. The clerk’s record, however, reflects a motion for new trial was granted on September 26, 2007. Appellant did not respond to this Court’s November 1, 2007 letter questioning our jurisdiction over the appeal.

Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature deems appealable. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ). An order granting new trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over the appeal. See Boris v. Boris, 642 S.W.2d 855, 856 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1982, no writ).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 S.W.3d 930, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 37064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yan-v-xing-jiang-texapp-2008.