Yan Sui v. Richard Marshack

691 F. App'x 365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 2017
Docket15-60066
StatusUnpublished

This text of 691 F. App'x 365 (Yan Sui v. Richard Marshack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yan Sui v. Richard Marshack, 691 F. App'x 365 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtor Yan Sui appeals pro se from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) dismissing as moot Sui’s appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s determination that a bankruptcy appeal is moot. Nat'l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc. v. Stanley (In re Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc.), 152 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir. 1998). We affirm.

• The BAP properly dismissed Sui’s appeal as moot because the property at issue was conveyed to a third party which prevented the BAP from granting effective relief. See id. at 1180-81 (affirming dismissal on the basis of mootness where the sale of the property to a non-party prevented the. court from granting effective relief).

Because Sui’s appeal is moot, we do not consider his arguments addressing the underlying merits of the appeal.

All pending requests and motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeals
28 U.S.C. § 158(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 F. App'x 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yan-sui-v-richard-marshack-ca9-2017.