Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc.

122 A.D.3d 415, 994 N.Y.S.2d 540
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 2014·No. 13408 104524/10·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered May 24, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants J & He Transportation, Inc. (J&He) and New Hong Kong for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff Yan Lin’s complaint against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While defendants J&He and New Hong Kong neither owned nor operated the vehicle at issue, plaintiff Yan Lin raised triable issues of fact as to whether she reasonably relied upon the alleged misrepresentation of the driver, defendant Xiong Lin, that he was operating the vehicle on J&He’s behalf, because of some misleading conduct on the part of J&He (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 231 [1984]; Fogel v Hertz Intl, 141 AD2d 375, 376 [1st Dept 1988]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Acosta, DeGrasse and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc., 122 A.D.3d 415, 994 N.Y.S.2d 540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

122 A.D.3d 415 (Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallock v. State
474 N.E.2d 1178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Fogel v. Hertz International, Ltd.
141 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)