Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc.

122 A.D.3d 415, 994 N.Y.S.2d 540
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2014
Docket13408 104524/10
StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.3d 415 (Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yan Lin v. J & He Transportation, Inc., 122 A.D.3d 415, 994 N.Y.S.2d 540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered May 24, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants J & He Transportation, Inc. (J&He) and New Hong Kong for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff Yan Lin’s complaint against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While defendants J&He and New Hong Kong neither owned nor operated the vehicle at issue, plaintiff Yan Lin raised triable issues of fact as to whether she reasonably relied upon the alleged misrepresentation of the driver, defendant Xiong Lin, that he was operating the vehicle on J&He’s behalf, because of some misleading conduct on the part of J&He (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 231 [1984]; Fogel v Hertz Intl, 141 AD2d 375, 376 [1st Dept 1988]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Acosta, DeGrasse and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hallock v. State
474 N.E.2d 1178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Fogel v. Hertz International, Ltd.
141 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.3d 415, 994 N.Y.S.2d 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yan-lin-v-j-he-transportation-inc-nyappdiv-2014.