Yamhill Sanitary Public Market Co. v. Strowbridge

161 P. 93, 82 Or. 80, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 96
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 161 P. 93 (Yamhill Sanitary Public Market Co. v. Strowbridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yamhill Sanitary Public Market Co. v. Strowbridge, 161 P. 93, 82 Or. 80, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 96 (Or. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion Per Curiam.

An appeal from a judgment rendered in this action against the plaintiff, a corporation, for the costs and disbursements was taken and perfected by it. The-transcript was filed with our clerk July 8, 1916, but no abstract has been filed as required by Rule VI, of this court (56 Or. 616, 117 Pac. ix). The defendants’’ counsel, ás soon as they learned of the default, moved upon notice to dismiss the appeal on account of that [81]*81failure. No reason has been assigned or excuse given for the neglect.

Upon the authority of Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561 (40 Pac. 230), Close v. Close, 28 Or. 108 (42 Pac. 128), and Morrison v. Hall, 55 Or. 243 (104 Pac. 963),. the appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. Allen
148 P.2d 936 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Morley Const. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
90 F.2d 976 (Eighth Circuit, 1937)
Admiral Oriental Line v. United States
86 F.2d 201 (Second Circuit, 1936)
United States Rubber Co. v. Kimsey
26 P.2d 565 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Josephian v. Lion
227 P. 204 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
McFarland v. Hueners
190 P. 584 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 P. 93, 82 Or. 80, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yamhill-sanitary-public-market-co-v-strowbridge-or-1916.