Yama Ribbons and Bows Co. v. United States

710 F. Supp. 3d 1358, 2024 CIT 89
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedAugust 5, 2024
Docket20-00059
StatusPublished

This text of 710 F. Supp. 3d 1358 (Yama Ribbons and Bows Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yama Ribbons and Bows Co. v. United States, 710 F. Supp. 3d 1358, 2024 CIT 89 (cit 2024).

Opinion

SlipȱOp.ȱ24Ȭ89ȱ

UNITEDȱSTATESȱCOURTȱOFȱINTERNATIONALȱTRADEȱ

YAMAȱRIBBONSȱANDȱBOWSȱCO.,ȱLTD.,ȱ

Plaintiff,ȱ

v.ȱ

UNITEDȱSTATES,ȱ Before:ȱȱTimothyȱC.ȱStanceu,ȱJudgeȱ

Defendant,ȱ CourtȱNo.ȱ20Ȭ00059ȱ

andȱ

BERWICKȱOFFRAYȱLLC,ȱ

DefendantȬIntervenor.ȱ

JUDGMENTȱ

BeforeȱtheȱcourtȱareȱtheȱFinalȱResultsȱofȱRedeterminationȱPursuantȱtoȱCourtȱRemandȱ

(Juneȱ10,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ57Ȭ1ȱ(theȱ“SecondȱRemandȱRedetermination”),ȱwhichȱtheȱ

InternationalȱTradeȱAdministration,ȱU.S.ȱDepartmentȱofȱCommerceȱ(“Commerce”)ȱ

issuedȱinȱresponseȱtoȱtheȱcourt’sȱopinionȱandȱorderȱinȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBowsȱCo.,ȱLtd.ȱv.ȱ

UnitedȱStates,ȱ48ȱCITȱ__,ȱ698ȱF.ȱSupp.ȱ3dȱ1255ȱ(2024).ȱȱInȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱ

Redetermination,ȱCommerceȱselectedȱaȱnewȱcountervailingȱdutyȱsubsidyȱrateȱforȱtheȱ

ExportȱBuyer’sȱCreditȱProgramȱofȱ0.87%ȱand,ȱaccordingly,ȱrecalculatedȱaȱtotalȱsubsidyȱ CourtȱNo.ȱ20Ȭ00059ȱ ȱ Pageȱ2ȱ ȱ rateȱofȱ22.20%ȱforȱplaintiffȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBows,ȱCo.,ȱLtd.ȱ(“Yama”).ȱȱSecondȱRemandȱ

Redeterminationȱatȱ6.ȱ

Noȱpartyȱsubmittedȱsubstantiveȱcommentsȱon,ȱorȱotherwiseȱobjectedȱto,ȱtheȱ

SecondȱRemandȱRedetermination.ȱȱPl.’sȱCommentsȱonȱCommerce’sȱFinalȱ

RedeterminationȱpursuantȱtoȱCourtȱRemandȱ(Julyȱ12,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ59;ȱDef.ȬInt.’sȱ

SubmissionȱIndicatingȱNoȱCommentsȱ(Julyȱ15,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ60.ȱȱDefendantȱadvocatesȱ

thatȱtheȱcourtȱsustainȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedetermination.ȱȱDef.’sȱCommentsȱinȱ

SupportȱofȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱ(Julyȱ24,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ61.ȱ

TheȱcourtȱhasȱreviewedȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱandȱhasȱ

determinedȱthatȱitȱcompliesȱwithȱtheȱopinionȱandȱorderȱinȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBowsȱCo.,ȱ

Ltd.ȱv.ȱUnitedȱStates,ȱ48ȱCITȱ__,ȱ698ȱF.ȱSupp.ȱ3dȱ1255ȱ(2024).ȱȱTherefore,ȱuponȱ

considerationȱofȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱandȱallȱpapersȱandȱproceedingsȱ

hadȱherein,ȱuponȱdueȱdeliberation,ȱandȱinȱtheȱabsenceȱofȱanȱobjectionȱbyȱanyȱparty,ȱitȱisȱ

herebyȱ

ORDEREDȱthatȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱbe,ȱandȱherebyȱis,ȱsustained;ȱ andȱitȱisȱfurtherȱȱ ȱ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 F. Supp. 3d 1358, 2024 CIT 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yama-ribbons-and-bows-co-v-united-states-cit-2024.