Yalon v. Tiangco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yalon v. Tiangco

186 A.D.2d 395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 395 (Yalon v. Tiangco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yalon v. Tiangco, 186 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered October 15, 1991, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The expert’s affidavit submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this medical malpractice action (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]) was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered October 15, 1991, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The expert’s affidavit submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this medical malpractice action (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]) was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yalon-v-tiangco-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack