Yalango v. Popp

New York Court of Appeals

Yalango v. Popp

651 N.E.2d 917, 85 N.Y.2d 960, 628 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1511

DecidedMay 4, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 651 N.E.2d 917 (Yalango v. Popp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yalango v. Popp, 651 N.E.2d 917, 85 N.Y.2d 960, 628 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1511 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[961]*961Motion by respondent O’Connell and Aronowitz, P. C. for clarification of this Court’s opinion and for amendment of remittitur denied. [See, 84 NY2d 601.] This Court’s opinion established that respondent was required to return all moneys retained in excess of the statutory fee to appellant. The issue of interest accrual was never addressed in the parties’ submissions to this Court, and is not appropriately raised for the first time on this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[961]*961Motion by respondent O’Connell and Aronowitz, P. C. for clarification of this Court’s opinion and for amendment of remittitur denied. [See, 84 NY2d 601.] This Court’s opinion established that respondent was required to return all moneys retained in excess of the statutory fee to appellant. The issue of interest accrual was never addressed in the parties’ submissions to this Court, and is not appropriately raised for the first time on this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

651 N.E.2d 917, 85 N.Y.2d 960, 628 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yalango-v-popp-ny-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack