Yakymiw v. Huguet

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yakymiw v. Huguet

186 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2016 WL 852943

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 2016

DocketNo. 1D16-0240

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 625 (Yakymiw v. Huguet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yakymiw v. Huguet, 186 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2016 WL 852943 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Powell v. Florida Dep’t of Corr., 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.l40(j) (now rule 9.141(c)) are not applicable). See also Hollingsworth v. Szczecina, 731 So.2d 790, 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (dismissing untimely civil appeal “without prejudice to [appellant’s] right to seek relief in the trial court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, requesting that the original order be vacated and a new order entered, such that the right to seek appellate review may be preserved.”).

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Powell v. Florida Dep’t of Corr., 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.l40(j) (now rule 9.141(c)) are not applicable). See also Hollingsworth v. Szczecina, 731 So.2d 790, 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (dismissing untimely civil appeal “without prejudice to [appellant’s] right to seek relief in the trial court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, requesting that the original order be vacated and a new order entered, such that the right to seek appellate review may be preserved.”).

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2016 WL 852943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yakymiw-v-huguet-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack