Yakey v. Leich

Indiana Court of Appeals

Yakey v. Leich

76 N.E. 926, 37 Ind. App. 393, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 46

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 1906

DocketNo. 5,635

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 N.E. 926 (Yakey v. Leich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yakey v. Leich, 76 N.E. 926, 37 Ind. App. 393, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 46 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Comstock, J.

1. Appellees were plaintiffs below, and as partners sued Joseph W. Yakey, appellant, as clerk of the Greene Circuit Court, to recover the sum of $29.38, 'alleged to have been paid to said clerk for their use and benefit, and which he refused to pay to them upon their demand. The cause was put at issue by general denial, and the trial by court resulted in a judgment in favor of appellees for $29.38. The complaint was filed' May 5, 1903, and judgment rendered March 9, 1904. At the commencement of the action and at the date of the rendition of the judgment, §1337f Eurns 1905, Acts 1903, p. 280, §1, in force March 9, 1903, defined the jurisdiction of appeals in civil cases in the following language: “No appeal shall hereafter be taken to the Supreme Court or Appellate Court in any civil case where the amount in the controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed $50, except as provided in section eight of this act.”

2. There is not in this case any question mentioned in section eight. This court must take notice of its want of jurisdiction. Everett Piano Co. v. Bash (1903), 31 Ind. App. 498, and cases cited.

The lack of jurisdiction appears, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comstock, J.

1. Appellees were plaintiffs below, and as partners sued Joseph W. Yakey, appellant, as clerk of the Greene Circuit Court, to recover the sum of $29.38, 'alleged to have been paid to said clerk for their use and benefit, and which he refused to pay to them upon their demand. The cause was put at issue by general denial, and the trial by court resulted in a judgment in favor of appellees for $29.38. The complaint was filed' May 5, 1903, and judgment rendered March 9, 1904. At the commencement of the action and at the date of the rendition of the judgment, §1337f Eurns 1905, Acts 1903, p. 280, §1, in force March 9, 1903, defined the jurisdiction of appeals in civil cases in the following language: “No appeal shall hereafter be taken to the Supreme Court or Appellate Court in any civil case where the amount in the controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed $50, except as provided in section eight of this act.”

2. There is not in this case any question mentioned in section eight. This court must take notice of its want of jurisdiction. Everett Piano Co. v. Bash (1903), 31 Ind. App. 498, and cases cited.

The lack of jurisdiction appears, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 N.E. 926, 37 Ind. App. 393, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yakey-v-leich-indctapp-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack