Yajaira J.L. v. Robert Bruce Scott L.

99 A.D.3d 579, 953 N.Y.2d 14

This text of 99 A.D.3d 579 (Yajaira J.L. v. Robert Bruce Scott L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yajaira J.L. v. Robert Bruce Scott L., 99 A.D.3d 579, 953 N.Y.2d 14 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Because the order of protection has expired, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Diallo v Diallo, 68 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2009], lv dismissed 14 NY3d 854 [2010]). Were we to reach the merits, we would find that a fair preponderance of the evidence (Family Ct Act § 832), including petitioner’s testimony, supports the court’s finding that respondent committed acts that constitute the family offenses of harassment and attempted assault (see Penal Law §§ 110.10, 120.05, 240.25, 240.26 [1], [3]), warranting the issuance of an order of protection {see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]). There is no basis to disturb the court’s credibility determinations (see Matter of F.B. v W.B., 248 AD2d 119 [1st Dept 1998]). Concur — Friedman, J.E, Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F.B. v. W.B.
248 A.D.2d 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 579, 953 N.Y.2d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yajaira-jl-v-robert-bruce-scott-l-nyappdiv-2012.