Yahel Eliyah McDaniel v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2022
Docket11-21-00082-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Yahel Eliyah McDaniel v. the State of Texas (Yahel Eliyah McDaniel v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yahel Eliyah McDaniel v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order filed January 13, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-21-00082-CR __________

YAHEL ELIYAH MCDANIEL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 91st District Court Eastland County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 25663, 25665, 25668, 25760, & 25960

ORDER This appeal has become stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s court- appointed counsel, John W. Stickels, to provide the appellate record to Appellant. Stickels filed an Anders 1 brief and motion to withdraw after this appeal was reinstated; the appeal had been abated for a hearing due to Stickels’s failure to timely file a brief. When Stickels filed his Anders brief in this court, he indicated at that

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). time that he had sent a copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record to Appellant. Appellant, however, filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate record and wishes to exercise his right to review the record prior to filing his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. Consequently, the clerk of this court contacted Stickels to inquire about the matter. Stickels stated that he had not yet sent the record but that he would do so by January 3, 2022, and that he would provide this court with proof of delivery of the appellate record to Appellant. Because this court must ensure that the appellate record is made available to Appellant, we issue this order specifying the procedure to be followed in this case. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 320–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). John W. Stickels is directed to provide a copy of the appellate record (both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record) to Appellant. The appellate record shall be mailed on, or before January 20, 2022, with a return receipt requested, to Appellant at the following address: Yahel Eliyah McDaniel TDCJ #02347786 J. Middleton Unit 13055 FM 3522 Abilene, TX 79601 Stickels is also directed to report to this court in writing—and provide proof—when the appellate record has been made available to Appellant. See id. at 321.

PER CURIAM January 13, 2022 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yahel Eliyah McDaniel v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yahel-eliyah-mcdaniel-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.