Yaffa v. Yaffa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yaffa v. Yaffa

272 A.D.2d 820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 820 (Yaffa v. Yaffa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yaffa v. Yaffa, 272 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for annulment of marriage, defendant wife moved for an order directing that plaintiff pay to her aliiriony and counsel fee, as .well as her traveling .expenses from England, where she now resides, to this State, in order to defend the action. The court granted the motion for alimony and counsel fees but denied the other relief, and defendant appeals. Resettled order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to defendant’s making an application to have her testimony taken by deposition, if she be so advised. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur; Hagarty, Acting P. J., dissents and votes to modify the order by striking from the fourth ordering paragraph the word “ denied ” and inserting in place thereof the word “ granted ”, and, as thus modified, to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for annulment of marriage, defendant wife moved for an order directing that plaintiff pay to her aliiriony and counsel fee, as .well as her traveling .expenses from England, where she now resides, to this State, in order to defend the action. The court granted the motion for alimony and counsel fees but denied the other relief, and defendant appeals. Resettled order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to defendant’s making an application to have her testimony taken by deposition, if she be so advised. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur; Hagarty, Acting P. J., dissents and votes to modify the order by striking from the fourth ordering paragraph the word “ denied ” and inserting in place thereof the word “ granted ”, and, as thus modified, to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yaffa-v-yaffa-nyappdiv-1947.