Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works

52 N.W.2d 116, 236 Minn. 128, 1952 Minn. LEXIS 634
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 29, 1952
Docket35,665
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 52 N.W.2d 116 (Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works, 52 N.W.2d 116, 236 Minn. 128, 1952 Minn. LEXIS 634 (Mich. 1952).

Opinion

Magney, Justice.

Certiorari to review a determination of the industrial commission denying compensation.

For 12 years until he became disabled, Bernard F. Taeger, now 59 years of age, had been employed by the Delano Granite Works as a granite cutter, shaping monuments with hand hammer and automatic air tools. He became incapacitated from silicosis, an occupational disease, resulting from the nature of his employment, and sought compensation. The industrial commission was of the opinion that the statutory limitation particularly applicable to this disease barred his right to compensation. This determination we are asked to review.

It is conceded that silicosis is an occupational disease, and covered by the workmen’s compensation act. But to entitle a workman to compensation for disability from this disease, he must have contracted it within a certain time previous to his disablement. The statute covering this matter is M. S. A. 1915, § 176.66, subd. 3, 2 which reads:

“Neither the employee nor his dependents are entitled to compensation for disability or death resulting from occupational disease, unless such disease is due to the nature of his employment as defined in section 176.01, subdivision 15, and was contracted therein within 12 months previous to the date of disablement; except in the case of silicosis or asbestosis, m which cases the disease must have been contracted within three years previous to the date of disablement ” (Italics supplied.)

*130 Yaeger worked steadily until he came down with pneumonia and a bad case of silicosis on December 31, 1948, except for seven weeks in 1947, when he was unable to work because of a “nervous stomach.” The first time he noticed any effect from what he now knows is silicosis was in the middle of 1948. Until that time he had no reason to suspect that there was anything wrong with his lungs, and he had good working capacity. He states that at that time, while engaged in breaking off part of a stone with a 12- to 16-pound hammer, “all of a sudden it was just as though my air stopped and from that day on I noticed it and before that I never had any idea there was anything like that.” Prior to that time he had no pains in the chest. Since then he has coughed, been short of breath on slightest exertion, and weak and tired.

In 1938, and every year since, except in 1946, when films were unavailable, Yaeger has been examined by a doctor and X rays have been taken. X rays taken in 1944, 1945, 1947, and 1948 showed a progressively increased area and density of a silicotic condition. As early as the X ray of April 26, 1944, an advanced second-degree silicosis was shown, with extension nodules in both lungs, which in some places were becoming confluent. Prior to 1948, he was not advised as to the findings of those examinations as to silicosis. Yaeger is totally and permanently disabled. His disability is the result of pulmonary silicosis, third degree, produced by his longstanding exposure to silica dust in his occupation as a granite cutter. He passed from stage 2 to stage 3 between 1945 and 1947. He was physically fit for work as a stonecutter until December 1948. From August 1949 to December 1949, contrary to the advice of his physician, he worked intermittently at a light job, earning $400.20. Since then he has been totally incapacitated.

Silicosis is caused by the inhalation of dust-laden silica. When a person works in a place with a high concentration of silica dust, the silica gradually accumulates in the lungs, eventually causing such a silicotic condition that the person becomes incapacitated for work. Without going into a discussion of the difference between stage 2 and stage 3 (the advanced variety), it is sufficient to state *131 that, even when a person is suffering from stage 3 silicosis, he would not experience shortness of breath unless he encountered complications; and, according to respondents’ expert, Dr. J. A. Myers, a great many persons go through life with stage 3 silicosis without incapacity, but when some infection comes along, attention is usually called to the silicosis.

On this record, the industrial commission found:

“That on December 31, 1918, said employe suffered an accidental injury which arose out of and in the course of his said employment by reason of the fact that on said date he became temporarily totally disabled from an occupational disease known as silicosis. That said disease was due to and caused by the nature of his employment with said employer but was not contracted within three years prior to the date of his disablement.”

In an opinion accompanying the determination, Commissioner Faricy said:

“From the * * * evidence submitted, it is clear that the employe had contracted ‘silicosis’ in 1911, and had a fairly well developed silicotic condition present to at least a second degree on a basis of 1 to 1 in 1911 and 1915. This would establish the contracting of silicosis well beyond the three year limitation imposed by Sec. 176.66, Subd. 3.”

The question submitted to us is whether, under the evidence in this case, the occupational disease of silicosis was contracted within three years before disablement within the meaning of the workmen’s compensation act.

Yaeger contends that the law applicable to his case can be stated as follows:

“Silicosis, as an occupational disease under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, is contracted at the time when it manifests itself so as to interfere with bodily functions.”

As an authority he cites Kellerman v. City of St. Paul, 211 Minn. 351, 1 N. W. (2d) 378. Kellerman was a city fireman. On Septem *132 ber 30, 1939, he responded to a call. After the fire had been extinguished, while assisting in cleaning up, he felt a severe pain in his chest. He died shortly thereafter. The cause of death was coronary sclerosis. His widow filed a claim for compensation for herself and minor children. The city contended, among other things, that the disease which caused Kellerman’s death was not contracted within 12 months of disablement as required by statute. Petitioner conceded that (211 Minn. 352, 1 N. W. [2d] 379) the “original commencement of the condition probably occurred more than a year prior to Kellerman’s death,” but claimed that the disease was not “ ‘contracted’ within the meaning of the law until it manifested itself or interfered with the bodily functions of decedent.” The medical testimony was to the effect that coronary sclerosis (211 Minn. 353, 1 N. W. [2d] 379) “is a hardening of the arteries which supply the blood for the nourishment of the heart muscle. It consists largely of an infiltration of cholesterol into the middle or inner coat of those arteries whereby a thickening of that coat takes place which ultimately narrows down the bore of those vessels so that a smaller supply of blood and a continuously decreasing supply of blood, as years go on, is carried to the heart muscles, so that ultimately the heart muscles fail because of too small a supply of blood to them.” All the expert witnesses agreed that many years elapse between the inception of the sclerotic condition and resultant death. The court said (211 Minn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Department of Labor & Industries
699 P.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1985)
Notch v. Victory Granite Co.
238 N.W.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1976)
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company
197 N.W.2d 443 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.
158 N.W.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1968)
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
115 N.W.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis
103 N.W.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1960)
Kalmes v. KAHLER CORPORATION
103 N.W.2d 203 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1960)
Kress v. Minneapolis-Moline Co.
102 N.W.2d 497 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1960)
Corcoran v. PG Corcoran Co. Inc.
71 N.W.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.W.2d 116, 236 Minn. 128, 1952 Minn. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yaeger-v-delano-granite-works-minn-1952.