Yadid, LLC v. GCW Bell Corp.

48 A.D.3d 799, 851 N.Y.S.2d 356
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 799 (Yadid, LLC v. GCW Bell Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yadid, LLC v. GCW Bell Corp., 48 A.D.3d 799, 851 N.Y.S.2d 356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Jacques Romulus appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J), dated February 14, 2006, as, upon granting his motion, in effect, to vacate a default judgment against him, conditioned the vacatur upon the depositing of his taxi medallion with the court, and (2) from an order of the same court dated June 20, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion, among other things, to direct him to deposit his taxi medallion with the court, and, in effect, amended the order dated February 14, 2006, by directing him to deposit his taxi medallion with the court or post a bond for the amount of the judgment with interest.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 14, [800]*8002006 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 20, 2006; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 20, 2006 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly conditioned vacatur of the default judgment upon a direction that he deposit his taxi medallion with the court or post a bond for the amount of the judgment with interest (see CPLR 5015 [a]; Testwell Craig Labs, v Charles Assoc., 264 AD2d 836 [1999]; Curry v Roman, 217 AD2d 314, 320 [1995]). Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Assael v. 15 Broad Street
84 A.D.3d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Doris v. Lewis
76 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 799, 851 N.Y.S.2d 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yadid-llc-v-gcw-bell-corp-nyappdiv-2008.