Yadgarov v. Dekel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yadgarov v. Dekel

2 A.D.3d 631, 768 N.Y.S.2d 337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 631 (Yadgarov v. Dekel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yadgarov v. Dekel, 2 A.D.3d 631, 768 N.Y.S.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated March 31, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

[632]*632Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, his motion was premature since substantial discovery remains outstanding (see generally Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 506 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated March 31, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

[632]*632Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, his motion was premature since substantial discovery remains outstanding (see generally Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 506 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 631, 768 N.Y.S.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yadgarov-v-dekel-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack