Yacoub v. Holder
This text of Yacoub v. Holder (Yacoub v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1897
ARAM YACOUB,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: June 2, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas V. Massucci, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Theo Nickerson, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Aram Yacoub, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions
for review from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We
have reviewed the administrative record and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314,
323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yacoub v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yacoub-v-holder-ca4-2009.